Revision 2 for 'Apostrophe use and eponyms'

All Revisions - View changeset

Apostrophe use and eponyms

Apostrophes are used according to standard English grammar rules. They are used for possessives and to indicate missing letters. Although previously also used in the pluralisation of letters (B's), numbers and acronyms (ICD's) this use is becoming obsolete and we therefore advise against it.

Apostrophes in eponyms

A particular note should be made on eponyms as the use of apostrophes in eponyms is debated. Many diseases, anatomical structures and landmarks are named after a person, either a patient, a doctor or someone entirely different. There is variation in the spelling of such eponyms when it comes to the inclusion of an apostrophe, effectively alternating between using a possessive form (Down's syndrome) or a non-possessive form (Down syndrome).

There is a trends towards the non-possessive form (without apostrophe) becoming more common. Radiopaedia.org aims for uniformity both regarding its own content and in the larger medical community and for this reason alone we prefer the non-possessive form. Furthermore, the use of an apostrophe can lead to ambiguity related to the genitive use (Cushing's disease doesn't usually indicate that Cushing has a disease).

The nonpossessive form, however, is easier to use, having fewer letters and symbols (which aren't always easy to find on any patricular keyboard) and more simple. The dedicated employment of the nonpossessive form will contribute to more simplicity, more efficient literature search strategies and less ambiguity.

Although dropping the apostrophe from well known terms might feel awkward initially, it's fairly easy to get used to and at Radiopaedia.org we'd like to set an example.

Examples

  • Down syndrome

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.